Westinghouse Bankruptcy: Nuclear Train Wrecks for Georgia and South Carolina

On March 29, 2017, Westinghouse Electric Corp. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a result of the massive cost overruns for the nuclear project construction at Southern Company’s Plant Vogtle (subsidiary Georgia Power) in Georgia and SCANA’s (subsidiary SCE&G) and Santee Cooper’s V.C. Summer plant in South Carolina.

Guest Blog | April 21, 2017 | Energy Policy, Georgia, Nuclear, South Carolina



toshiba-finacial-meltdownOn March 29, 2017, Westinghouse Electric Corp. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a result of the massive cost overruns for the nuclear project construction at Southern Company’s Plant Vogtle (subsidiary Georgia Power) in Georgia and SCANA’s (subsidiary SCE&G) and Santee Cooper’s V.C. Summer plant in South Carolina.

Westinghouse is a subsidiary of Japanese tech giant Toshiba and the designer and builder of the four under construction AP1000 nuclear reactors at Vogtle and Summer. The reactor design is yet to be operational anywhere in the world. The projects in both South Carolina and Georgia have been plagued with problems and are nearly four years delayed and many billions of dollars over budget. In fact, all four reactors were supposed to be operating by now (April 1, 2017 to be exact).

Toshiba has reported that their losses, which are in excess of $6 billion (and climbing) because of the failed nuclear projects in Georgia and South Carolina, have created “substantial uncertainty” over its ability to continue operations, which is also affecting its other tech businesses. Toshiba’s financial meltdown puts these new reactor projects on even shakier ground.

Georgia Power, SCE&G, and Santee Cooper, as well as Toshiba and Westinghouse, took a significant gamble on nuclear power and lost, leaving consumers holding the bill for billions of dollars. We need your help today to stop this abuse and tell the utilities and regulators to stop throwing good customer money after bad!

Georgia’s Nuclear Train Wreck: Plant Vogtle Construction

ga-trainwreck-snap-300x202In 2009, the Georgia Public Service Commission (GA PSC) approved Georgia Power to build two additional Toshiba-Westinghouse AP1000 nuclear reactors at Plant Vogtle in Waynesboro, Georgia along the Savannah River. Meanwhile, the state legislature passed the “Georgia Nuclear Energy Financing Act,” which allowed Georgia Power to begin collecting the costs of financing the project from customers during construction. Construction of the project began that year but immediately ran into problems that have continued today, resulting in major delays and cost overruns. Despite these concerns, the GA PSC has continuously approved Georgia Power’s requests increasing charges on customers —reviewed expenditures for Georgia Power’s share now total $3.68 billion — in more recent testimony spending on capital costs have increased to $3.9 billion.

Vogtle Units 3 and 4 were originally scheduled to come online April 1, 2016 and April 1, 2017, respectively. Revised schedules from Westinghouse, as disclosed in their February 2017 earnings call, estimated the completion date of Vogtle Unit 3 as December 2019 and of Unit 4 as September 2020 but testimony from Georgia Power in the 16th semi-annual Vogtle Construction Monitoring (VCM) docket before the GA PSC stated that December 2020 project completion is not possible. Expert witnesses for the PSC Staff are estimating project completion may be even further delayed — to June 2022 and June 2023 with massive cost increases. Georgia Power is 45.7% owner of the project and is regulated by the PSC. The remaining utility partners are Oglethorpe Power (30%), MEAG (22.7%) and the City of Dalton (1.6%). Learn more here.

South Carolina’s Nuclear Train Wreck: V.C. Summer Construction

sc-train-wreck-memeIn 2007, the state legislature passed the anti-consumer Base Load Review Act, which allowed utilities to begin charging customers for the financing costs for new power plants before they are built. In 2009, the South Carolina Public Service Commission (SC PSC) approved SCE&G’s request to build two Toshiba-Westinghouse AP1000 nuclear reactors at their V.C. Summer nuclear plant near Jenkinsville along the Monticello Reservoir (formed by the Broad River), about twenty miles northwest of Columbia, South Carolina. SCE&G is a 55% owner in the project and is regulated by the SC PSC. Santee Cooper is a 45% owner. Problems ensued almost immediately, resulting in major delays and cost overruns, but the SC PSC has continuously approved SCE&G’s nuclear rate hike requests. V.C. Summer Units 2 and 3 were originally scheduled to come online April 1, 2016 and April 1, 2017, respectively.

On July 31, 2017, the Santee Cooper board voted unanimously to abandon the project, after announcing the findings of internal analysis that showed:

  • total project cost was pegged at $25 billion – up from an initial estimated $10 billion at the project outset
  • substantial completion date for the project was estimated to be pushed out to November of 2024 – initially estimated at April 2017, meaning 7.5 years delayed
  • additional rate increases of 41 percent would be required to finish the project

SCE&G followed suit, unable to complete any portion of the project without Santee Cooper as a partner, and announced they too would be abandoning the project.

What happens next in Georgia?

The short answer is that no one exactly knows. Vogtle is clearly in turmoil. Initially, short-term agreements between Westinghouse and Southern Company were arranged to keep construction underway that allowed Westinghouse to continue construction activities until April 28, 2017. However, Westinghouse, under bankruptcy protection, will no longer have to pay costs relating to the construction. Instead the utilities are directly paying Fluor, another key contractor on each project, and Westinghouse. Southern Company and Westinghouse negotiated several more extensions and the most recent expires June 22, 2017.

The utility partners in the project must decide what to do: will they abandon the project as South Carolina’s utilities did, will they delay, will they continue building one or both of the reactors, and if so, who will build it? There are few companies in the world with the capability to do so. Southern Company announced that is it receiving cost-to-complete analysis and bids from Fluor and Bechtel, potentially in August.

What happens next in South Carolina?

The political fallout from the cancellation of the project is huge and is unfolding in real time. Every day brings new information and possibilities to light, so it is hard to say what will happen next, but it’s clear that the utilities, regulators, and state legislators are on the hot seat.

SCE&G has proposed merging with Dominion Energy from Virginia, but to do so, the merger must first be approved by the South Carolina Public Service Commission, which will likely hold the case hearing in late 2018.

In the meantime, the General Assembly has filed numerous bills to help deal with some of the core issues that led to the V.C. Summer failure and its financial fallout. None of the bills go far enough to truly end the monopoly corruption, but some of the bills tackle essential problems. For example, there are bipartisan bills filed to: • repeal the Baseload Review Act; • ban campaign contributions from regulated utilities; • promote solar freedom and get rid of the utilities’ arbitrary cap on how many customers can sign up for fair terms when installing solar power at their home and business; • remove bureaucratic barriers from utilities using the lowest-cost energy resources; • finally create a real consumer advocate who can fight bad utility proposals.

What are these projects costing ratepayers?

SACE’s Sara Barczak speaks with WISTV.com in Columbia, SC. about impacts to ratepayers. Click the image to be taken to the news article.

Major delays in project construction cost customers a lot of money. Each day of delay costs customers millions of dollars. With the projects already nearly four years delayed, the costs to consumers add up fast.

Georgia Power customers are already paying more than 9.7 percent of their monthly bills in Nuclear Construction Cost Recovery (NCCR) costs. Nearly $2 billion in these pre-collected financing costs have been charged to ratepayers since 2011 due to anti-consumer state legislation passed in 2009 to incentivize building new reactors. This “nuclear tax” impacts many types of customers — homeowners, schools, municipalities, small businesses and it all adds up. The Vogtle project’s original approximated cost of $14.1 billion is now estimated to cost well over $20 billion.

V.C. Summer’s owners are SCANA’s SCE&G at 55% and Santee Cooper at 45%. According to the South Carolina Office of Regulatory Staff, the average SCE&G’s residential customer is currently paying over 18% of their monthly bill or over $27 per month in pre-collected financing costs (totaling over $1.4 billion so far). This comes out to about $1,500 per household already paid for the plant. SCE&G plans to spread out the $4.9 billion of plant abandonment costs over the next 60 years, meaning several generations will be paying for these mistakes. Santee Cooper has spent $4.7 billion on the plant and has raised rates on customers five times to help pay for construction.

Despite billions and billions of dollars spent and more than eight years into construction, Vogtle is only 36% complete and V.C. Summer will never produce a single kilowatt-hour! If construction on Vogtle continues, many billions of dollars of customers’ money will continue to get spent.

Enraged? Get engaged!

Since these projects began, SACE and our partners have continuously highlighted the ongoing, systemic problems with both projects. We need your help in educating your family, friends and neighbors about this issue to ensure all consumers are protected from this utility abuse of power.

Additional Resources

Guest Blog
My Profile